Icogny, I know you're reading this, I know you're not posting on purpose, I know you're trying to avoid talking about it. Whatever, your choice, doesn't matter that much.
What does matter is this, I finally made the deal with the devil, with the overseer of the game, I tell you, wasn't an easy thing to do, bu I did it.
The board is sett, I'll be waiting for you Incogny, I'll be waiting for you at one place that still means anything to you.
I know you'll find me, we started this, we need to finish this.
I'm waiting.
*grabs a bag of popcorn*
ReplyDeleteWhat constitutes "finishing this"?
ReplyDeleteMany things.
DeleteSuch as?
DeleteYou won't understand.
DeleteSorry I asked.
DeleteYou'll always be my best friend, whatever the fuck happens.
HA. Placing my bets now Kelly. Wonder who will walk away.
ReplyDeleteBoth of us will walk away victorious, only one will remain in this world.
DeleteHAHAHAHA. My MY all this tension has made you pretentious as shit. That is amazing. Hilarious as well.
DeleteNot pretentious, simply looking forward to bending the rules of reality once I depart, after this little game me and Incogny will have.
DeleteDo us a favour and don't die, eh? Not just your arse riding on this.
ReplyDeleteCare to elaborate?
DeleteMorningstar's going on a rampage if you die. You and Morningstar are the two terrifyingly strong forces at present. (Almost forgot redlight) And there's sorta of a pecking order as to which on of you is the most evil. You're sort of the least evil one.
DeleteWhy thank you, but, there is no pecking order, if Skywalker decides to do something, I can TRY to stop him, I CAN stop him, but I don't think I will, cause it is not my concern, I interfere, only when it affects me.
DeleteREALLY now Kelly. Even if I kill off dear little Sanna?
DeleteFuck you Star. You're not playing us off each other ever again.
DeleteAfter she completes her "training", after she lets go, only then will I not interfere. Right now, she hasn't achieved her freedom yet.
DeleteNo. Don't give Star leverage.
DeleteHey, can you tell me whether or not Morningstar has any weaknesses? He seems to want a fight with a "hero". And while I'm not quite a hero, killing that son of a bitch will do a bit of good. Even if he's replaced in less than a month.
ReplyDeleteKill the source that revives him.
DeleteCan you be less cryptic, pretty please? I'll owe you a favor. Non-interference, or killing some non-innocent for you. I mean, I can spend weeks trying to figure it out, but killing that jerk now would probably be much more rewarding.
DeleteLinux. The Attendants. That Samael dickbag or whatever. They revive him. As far as I know they exist beyond reality and laws. But not beyond dickbaggery.
DeleteLaws are meant to be broken, soon I will travel beyond the reality, very soon...
DeleteI ALREADY break rules. Haven't met any station attendants of reality. Rules are for the fucking proletariat, and we're the borgois aren't we? So much more powerful than the commoner, yet duty bound to protect them or possess them? Sounds like me at least.
DeleteAs a proletariat I note you have misspelled bourgeoisie. You'll lose some Marx for that.
DeleteOh. Also. Marxist theory says that the bourgeoisie are more likely to exploit the powerless, as opposed to being duty bound to protect them. But Marxism also states that "duties" and concepts which have been socialised into you are just to distract you from the slow realisation you are being exploited by the powerful. The moral of the story is A) people in power will exploit it and B) if someone has studied Marxism, don't get them talking about it cause they'll ramble.
DeleteI was thinking much more along the lines of Nietzche. Ubermensch and such, using Marxist terms as a simplification. And I apologize for my misspelling. And I ramble no matter what the topic is so you know, I can't look on that poorly.
DeleteNietzsche and Marx would have been at each others throats. They had incredibly different perspectives on the human condition, since AFAIK Nietzsche was a nihilist. Marx went on the assumption that we all have morals and the ability to recognise an unfair social system but that they can be "clouded" with the false consciousness, of which he says the institutions socialise one into in the interests of capitalism, (add Zaretsky and Plekhanov and all the other Marxists and I might talk for days!) but I'm reluctant to vandalise Kelevra's blog with a sociological perspective. I have this gut feeling he would more readily identify with Nietzsche than Marx. D:
Delete